To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8438
8437  |  8439
Subject: 
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 18:13:40 GMT
Viewed: 
1904 times
  
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:09:53PM +0000, Orion Pobursky wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
<snip>
I would consider the parts library and parts tracker a separate project.

To some extent the parts library will have to be goverened by the file spec.
The most glaring issues for this seem to be Part File naming and BFC complience.

hmmm... how is file naming part of the spec?  the spec says it's 8.3,
but what else would it say?

--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) See this web page: (URL) this one: (URL) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes: <snip> (...) To some extent the parts library will have to be goverened by the file spec. The most glaring issues for this seem to be Part File naming and BFC complience. -Orion (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR