To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8439
8438  |  8440
Subject: 
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 18:27:08 GMT
Viewed: 
3981 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
> <snip>
> > I would consider the parts library and parts tracker a separate project.
> 
> To some extent the parts library will have to be goverened by the file spec.
> The most glaring issues for this seem to be Part File naming and BFC complience.

Yes, of course the spec document would govern it. What I was more referring
to was bodies of people and processes.

-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes: <snip> (...) To some extent the parts library will have to be goverened by the file spec. The most glaring issues for this seem to be Part File naming and BFC complience. -Orion (24 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR