To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8440
8439  |  8441
Subject: 
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 18:28:10 GMT
Viewed: 
1876 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger writes:
Quoting Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com>:
The standards body should also be focused and limited in scope to defining
and publishing the LDraw file format spec, nothing more. I would consider
the parts library and parts tracker a separate project, and the (albeit
loose) administration of the website another as well. More on that later
when I've had time to organize my thoughts :-) (Lar - anything to add on
this one?)

I'm not lar, but I'll add anyway :)

I think this standards body should be compirsed of the people who write the
programs.  I do NOT think it should be a political body, at all.

I agree 100%.

-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
Quoting Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com>: (...) I disagree. How can you prevent the various programmers from adding new functionality to their software? Why should development on all these tools halt until the non-existent committee figure out what's (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR