|
 | | Re: New LDConfig.ldr color file
|
| (...) I don't really know what I'm talking about here, but I think there might be a big difference between the representation of RGB values in a dye based color system for bricks, another one for printing on paper, and a color system for computer (...) (15 years ago, 28-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.555)
|
|
| | Re: Technic Axle Joiner / Cross Block descriptions
|
| (...) So then, we shall say the same? Both us and BL have long-lived and complicated systems. I never really expected you or DATHeader to instantly change your way of life, but I believe that it is time to consider subtle changes to help bring our (...) (15 years ago, 28-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.555)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.555)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.555)
|
|
| | Technic Axle Joiner / Cross Block descriptions
|
| With almost all the "Technic Axle Joiner" parts on the Parts Tracker, I'd like to take the opportunity to rationalise the part descriptions which have developed over time as these parts have appeared. Currently we have: 6536.dat Technic Axle Joiner (...) (15 years ago, 22-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.555)
|
|
| | Re: L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
| (...) IMHO the page is quiet useful giving you a guideline when to hold a part and when not. You cannot expect a reviewer flicking through several pages to find out if the error he has spotted is reason enough to hold the part. To kickstart I'm (...) (15 years ago, 10-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.554)
|
|
| | L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
| Hi folks, it appears that thanks to the hard work of the LSC the LDraw specs have undergone considerably changes. Just to mention one the Colinear Tolerance for Concave Quads: (URL) the changes in the LDraw.org File Format Restrictions for Official (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.554)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.553)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.553)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.553)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.553)
|
|
| | LDraw.exe removed from distribution?
|
| Hello all, I just downloaded the complete.zip and discovered LDraw.exe is no longer present. I take this is a step in creating the 100% CA distro? Anyhow, I always used LDraw.exe to validate (in LD4DStudio) if a folder is indeed the library's root. (...) (15 years ago, 28-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.553)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.553)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.exe removed from distribution?
|
| (...) I'd go with ldconfig.ldr. LDraw.exe is now legacy software (and is in fact not complaint with the current spec). Since ldconfig.ldr is per spec where color are defined, it should always be present in a 100% complaint distro. -Orion (15 years ago, 29-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.553)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.exe removed from distribution?
|
| (...) I don't know if you're the only one who does this, but doing so will also cause LDView's library update to fail, since those notes are the only files that allow LDView to know what has been installed. --Travis (15 years ago, 2-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.552)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.552)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.552)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.552)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.exe removed from distribution?
|
| (...) Thanks, I think I'll check for the parts and p directories to determine if it's any kind of library, and issue a warning if ldconfig.ldr is missing when the official library is expected. ps: Sorry I responded slow, I'm having troubles posting (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.552)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.552)
|
