To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 9933
9932  |  9934
Subject: 
Re: Ghost bug in 3.11
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev
Followup-To: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:44:57 GMT
Viewed: 
1029 times
  
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Lee Gaiteri wrote:
I discovered when rendering with ldglite that it doesn't ignore
commands like 0 CLEAR and 0 STEP in submodels even when MLCad
does. (Odd, considering it does recognize submodels.) Hopefully the
next version of LPub will eliminate that problem by creating
special .dat files for each step, but just to be safe for now I
figured I'd ghost out the step and clear commands, and the buffer
exchanges too. ldglite renders just fine with those ghosted.

Did you use 1.1.5 and the -mf or -mF options?  I know these options
make ldglite ignore STEP.

I'm a bit lost here.  Are you talking about using ldglite to render
image files, or render interactively?  I ask because -mf and -mF
ignore all STEP commands, but only for the non-interactive image file
generating usage.  There is a -D command (that was added to a later
version of ldlite) to set the subfile level at which to ignore STEP
commands.  See Version 2.3 Release Notes here.

  http://ldlite.sourceforge.net/

I suppose it could make sense to use the -D command to also control
the subfile level at which to ignore CLEAR, and perhaps other
instruction formatting macros like ROTSTEP and such.  I'm a bit fuzzy
on how well I incorporated the -D code from ldlite into ldglite,
especially with the L3 parser.  I suppose I should test it with both
parsers and see how well it extends to the other meta commands.  I
don't think there's much actual code involved.

The step dats that LPub makes do have STEP and ROTSTEP, but
eliminate buffer exchage and clear and such, before passing the step
dat to ldglite.

Well it turns out, you can ghost meta instructions just fine in
MLCad, but it never saves them as ghosted. The only way to ghost
them properly is to manually edit the .mpd file in a text
editor. MLCad recognizes on load that they're supposed to be
ghosted, but once you make any changes they go back to normal. So
MLCad is saving ghosted meta commands as unghosted.

I don't think you want to GHOST out those commands.  This is not
what GHOST is supposed to be used for.  In MLCAD you might want to
preceed these commands with WRITE (which MLCAD uses to mean
comment), also // would also work.

I'd just as soon not worry about it and have ldglite ignore those
commands, but no way am I delving into the source just for that.

Why is everyone so afraid of the source code?

As Don has indicated, he is already looking at this code.

Uh, yeah, I'm looking but I'm still having trouble figuring out how
it all fits together.

Don

Err, I set FUT to lugnet.cad.dev because I don't think my comments
really all that MLCad specific.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ghost bug in 3.11
 
(...) Did you use 1.1.5 and the -mf or -mF options? I know these options make ldglite ignore STEP. The step dats that LPub makes do have STEP and ROTSTEP, but eliminate buffer exchage and clear and such, before passing the step dat to ldglite. (...) (...) (20 years ago, 3-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)

6 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR