 | | Re: New guidelines on parts and numbers (long) —Chris Dee
|
| | | (...) So the 6H antenna is really clear underneath? I think the divers knives are white - anybody got a sprue they didn't throw out? What about the coins? I'd like to add my salutations the great work that has gone on in the backgound - well done. (...) (26 years ago, 1-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New guidelines on parts and numbers (long) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) That will be the way new parts are handled. Will we go back and redo (or undo) existing parts? I don't know. It's not out of the question. Steve (26 years ago, 1-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New guidelines on parts and numbers (long) —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) I really see no way out of doing it. An existing 8xxxx will, by definition, most likely have to go into a '_' category as a hard-coded piece. That would leave us without a corresponding #16 piece to use. So if we want that piece in #16, it (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
