 | | Re: LPub open source? —Don Heyse
|
| | | (...) Well, I don't have borland C++ and I'm not sure if you'd consider it helpful, but if you were to open the source there are some things I suspect I would do. I'd probably try to build as much as possible with gcc. Then I might try to replicate (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LPub open source? —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) Yes. I know and agree. As I've said before LPub *will* be opened sourced. I promise. It is a question of when. I'd like to get it to a certain level (the page layout and compact PLIs is probably it (maybe language neutral add-on interface for (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPub open source? —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) Trust me, there's always going to be something else you should do before releasing the source. My personal favorite excuse that the code "just needs to be cleaned up a bit first". Since that's not as much fun as adding cool new features, it's (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
