Subject:
|
Re: LPub open source?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:11:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1058 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Don Heyse writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague writes:
> > If I were to open source LPub on sourceforce, is there anyone out there with
> > borland C++ builder 5.0 that would be willing to help me? I don't want to
> > bother if no one will help.
>
> Well, I don't have borland C++ and I'm not sure if you'd consider
> it helpful, but if you were to open the source there are some things
> I suspect I would do.
>
> I'd probably try to build as much as possible with gcc. Then I might
> try to replicate the GUI with something portable like tcl/tk, or I
> could decide that the time is ripe to learn some other portable GUI
> toolkit and do everything with gcc. On the other hand, it's quite
> possible I'd do nothing.
>
> The point is, you never know what someone will do with your source
> code until you put it out there. And most of the open source LDRAW
> tools have actually gotten some code from secondary contributors.
Yes. I know and agree. As I've said before LPub *will* be opened sourced. I
promise. It is a question of when.
I'd like to get it to a certain level (the page layout and compact PLIs is
probably it (maybe language neutral add-on interface for pre/post processing))
before I open source it. Once I open source it, the first thing I'd like to do
is make it multi-platform. Never done such a thing, but I'm sure I'll learn a
lot, so that makes it worth it.
I don't want to go to source forge with it right now, unless someone is going
to help with it in its current (and unfortunate) Borland only form.
>
> Don
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LPub open source?
|
| (...) Trust me, there's always going to be something else you should do before releasing the source. My personal favorite excuse that the code "just needs to be cleaned up a bit first". Since that's not as much fun as adding cool new features, it's (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LPub open source?
|
| (...) Well, I don't have borland C++ and I'm not sure if you'd consider it helpful, but if you were to open the source there are some things I suspect I would do. I'd probably try to build as much as possible with gcc. Then I might try to replicate (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
