 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Tim Courtney
|
| | | (...) That sounds good to me. If someone can further think this through, I can include it in a re-draft of the proposal sometime in the future. -Tim (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) How about this: Requirements for LSC Membership To ensure only competent, dedicated, and active contributors become members of the LSC, they shall have met one or more of the following requirements: - Authored an LDraw part subsequently (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Dwayne Miller
|
| | | | | (...) This is more what I was considering... a way for those who may or may not have been authoring Lego Parts to get a chance to be on the standards body. After all, its possible, but unlikely that another use for the program could overshadow the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | | | (...) Part updates are currently every two months. 0303 (due to come out in about a week, I think?) will probably be a small update, since the Tracker hasn't been up for weeks. . . -- TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Timeframe for Next Parts Update (was Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) It would be better to say they are approximately every two months. I'll start working on 2003-02 sometime after I've got the PT back online, and I've got some time for it. I think it's going to be two weeks before I can get to it. Steve (22 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | (...) Every time I've seen Qualification 2, I've thought it needed clarification. How about: "Served as a reviewer on the Parts Tracker and posted at least 5 reviews for each of at least 2 official updates." After all, just because someone only (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
