Subject:
|
Re: Parts Tracker Email Notification System
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:51:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
440 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Damien Guichard wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Bernd Broich writes:
> > Thanks for this tool. I got such a message after I send a
> > fixed part (one of mine) to the tracker. So I think this is
> > the right way, but I think there is no message necessary when I
> > change a part that is from me.
>
> I am notified simply because I have reviewed (not have been reviewed), that
> is a little too much, isn't it?
I don't know, is it? I never was able to decide what was the right
level of announcements. I'm open to input on this point. :)
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Parts Tracker Email Notification System
|
| (...) This topic (how much notification to give) just came up in real life requirements, so pardon the following ranting... Notification to my way of thinking serves two purposes... confirming the expected (we expect a part to progress through (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
