Subject:
|
Re: HELP: transformation of primitive causes BFC to stop working
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:35:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
395 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Lance Hopenwasser writes:
> Yep, that did the trick. Now that you gave me the coordinates, I can see
> that I wanted the original y vector (0,1,0) to go to -z (0, 0, -1), instead
> of staying y like I had it. This rotating and scaling stuff can be kind of
> tricky to visualize, can't it? And it has been a LONG LONG time since I
> have had to do any linear algebra, so I feel very rusty.
>
> Thanks for such a fast response.
> --Lance--
>
> > I think this line is what you want:
> >
> > 1 16 10 10 2 0 0 8 -8 0 0 0 -1 0 2-4ndis.dat
> >
> > Let me know if I'm right.
> >
> > -Orion
Actually, I cheated. I hate doing the math and still don't understand the
matrix tranforms well enough to look at a matrix and know what it's doing,
so I use MLCad to rotate things for me.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: HELP: transformation of primitive causes BFC to stop working
|
| Yep, that did the trick. Now that you gave me the coordinates, I can see that I wanted the original y vector (0,1,0) to go to -z (0, 0, -1), instead of staying y like I had it. This rotating and scaling stuff can be kind of tricky to visualize, (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
