 | | MPD Parts? (and a confession) —Ben Bennett
|
| | | Okay, so it is easy to display an MPD file, but what do people think about allowing part files to be MPDs? This would allow making the sub-parts that are related to a part to be packaged with the part. The trick is how to determine what file an MPD (...) (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: MPD Parts? (and a confession) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I suggested this for LDraw2. I think Jacob is including some variation of this idea. And Paul Gyugyi is actively talking about supporting this in LDLite. I think (but I'm not sure) Lars is going this way in L3P as well. (...) One thing Gyug is (...) (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD Parts? (and a confession) —Ben Bennett
|
| | | | | (...) Cool. I have it implemented and it works tolerably well. (...) modelling (...) Rokenbok is mostly not compatible, only the plates have the requisite nubs on them. But that is cool since you can build any Lego construction off the plates and (...) (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MPD Parts? (and a confession) —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | | | | Well, as soon as any toy manufacturer offers me an incentive (hint hint), I'll add a user-definable search path for LDLite, so it could look in /rok as well as /p and /parts and /models. -gyug (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD Parts? (and a confession) —John Bauman
|
| | | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <36fa79e0.2302399@lu...et.com>... (...) And the class system I had the idea for(e.g. archive.mpd::curlpart.dat to access curlpart.dat without loading archive.mpd)only seems kind of right to C++ programers. (26 years ago, 1-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
