 | | Re: PT Suggestion —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Define "next" in this context. With a good definition of "next" I think it would be great... (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: PT Suggestion —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I've been thinking more about this, I'm not sure what a good "next" would be. The current (URL) queue page> works on sort of the current data. Posting a review upsets that sort, so it's hard to say "give me the next file after the one I just (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: PT Suggestion —Daniel Crichton
|
| | | | "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GyICs1.3o2@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) be (...) It's more complicated to program, but wouldn't it be an idea to show the next part that is similar to the one you've just looked at? Eg. you (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: PT Suggestion —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Hmm. You're right - it's a good idea, and it would be hard to program. Prompted by Jennifer and Dan, I've added "Next File" and "Previous File" links on the part details page. I suppose those links could go on the review results page, too... (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
