Subject:
|
Re: Advice please on DATs for bendy-arm holder 2x2 brick
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:52:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
406 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee writes:
> I am almost ready to post dat file(s) for the 2x2 brick used to hold the
> bendy-arms in classic space and maxifigs. It is composed of two separate • pieces
> which clip together (neither of my examples have embossed part numbers).
>
> My question is - should this be a single part with two subparts OR two • separate
> parts? If two parts should they have a common origin - which will be outside
> the part boundary for one of them.
> Analogies may be drawn with the lattice pillar (2580) and top (2579), and the
> 2x2 plate turntable base (3680) and top (3679) each modelled separately.
> Electric motor assemblies have typically used the sub-part approach.
>
> The question is complicated by the fact that the top piece (at least) exists • in
> two visibly distinct versions - one with a round hole and one with just two
> small slots. I have not yet managed to dismantle my slotted version to see if
> the lower piece is unchanged.
>
> Chris
I can now confirm that the lower piece is identical in both versions, so, I'll
try to author the alternate upper part whilst I wait for advice/comment.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Advice please on DATs for bendy-arm holder 2x2 brick
|
| I am almost ready to post dat file(s) for the 2x2 brick used to hold the bendy-arms in classic space and maxifigs. It is composed of two separate pieces which clip together (neither of my examples have embossed part numbers). My question is - should (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
