 | | Re: Ldraw.organization —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) That seems backwards to me. If "LCAD" is the all-encompassing term we want to use, then LDraw would be a subset of LCAD, and the 'proper' subdomain name would be ldraw.lcad.org (to go along with mlcad.lcad.org, etc). But that's working from an (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Ldraw.organization —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:chls3tksoa478uk...4ax.com... (...) So, what is your position on this, Steve? -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) - Zacktron Alliance ICQ: 23951114 - (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Ldraw.organization —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) See (URL). Stick with www.ldraw.org for all our LCAD needs. "LDraw" should be the primary term for things LEGO CAD-ish, not just a reference to an obsolete program. Steve (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Ldraw.organization —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Shouldn't the latter be mlcad.ldraw.lcad.org? I tend to view any program which uses the LDraw parts library in any way as a descendant of the LDraw heritage, and hence as a subset of "LDraw in the wider sense". If a LEGO CAD program "Xyzzy" (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ldraw.organization —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Right. But if something new and plainly better (in all aspects) comes along, we can as easily label it "LDraw Mk II" as any other name. Assuming the author(s) would go along willingly, of course. :) Steve (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
