 | | Re: I'm doing the revolving/"secret" door parts
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:6snl0t4tiaba1eo...4ax.com... [snip] (...) Weren't (...) I first saw them in the 1997 Fright Knights set 6087 (Witch's Magic Manor). --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@san.REMOVE.rr.com) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm doing the revolving/"secret" door parts
|
|
(...) So, you're saying these should be of the "Door" CATEGORY, and not of the "Panel" CATEGORY? I'm not sure I agree, 'cuz this meta-part assembly is supposed to be a _wall_ (i.e., a panel) that just _happens_ to include a secret/revolving door. In (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm doing the revolving/"secret" door parts
|
|
(...) How about: 30101.DAT Door 2 x 8 x 6 Frame Revolving 30102.DAT Door 2 x 8 x 6 Revolving 30102P01.DAT Door 2 x 8 x 6 Revolving with Ninja Pattern I'm not keen on using themes in part names, but in this case, I can't think of a better name. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm doing the revolving/"secret" door parts
|
|
(...) I recomend using 30102 because both 30101.dat, the frame and the door would have been created at the same time so it would fit that they would use part numbers that are next to each other. (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | I'm doing the revolving/"secret" door parts
|
|
I'm calling "dibs" on the following: 30101.dat, "Panel 2 x 8 x 6 Revolving Frame" 30102.dat (30344.dat?), "Panel 2 x 8 x 6 Revolving Door" 30102p01.dat, "Panel 2 x 8 x 6 Revolving Door - Ninja pattern" These were the best names I could think of. I'm (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for parts
|
|
(...) Yes, it does matter. L3P/L3Lab give you a warning SKIPPING "a.mpd" Line 4: FILE b.dat already read: 0 FILE B.DAT and 'some stuff' gets treated as part of file A.DAT. So here 'some other stuff' and 'some stuff' get drawn. (...) Right, my (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for parts
|
|
(...) That's what I assumed. (...) Does it matter if C.DAT references B.DAT *before* referencing A.MPD? This would change the example to: (...) That makes sense, and is simpler to implement. And could even be useful, under certain circumstances. (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bend thingie creator. retry
|
|
Ok , I think I have exterminated the problems with my rotationmatrix and I have rezipped it and again put it online at (URL) also an example jpg now. Please test it and let me know if it gives some strange twists or if it crashes or something like (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for parts
|
|
(...) I'm glad you agree. (...) L3P/L3Lab will draw 'some stuff' twice. The file B.DAT is never loaded, as the subfile B.DAT was loaded during reading A.MPD. It doesn't matter whether subfile A.DAT references B.DAT or not. An MPD should be regarded (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Searching for parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) Yeah, I realized (after posting my message), that it was a problem with LDLite handling a subfile which was an MPD. I changed to the equivalent DAT, and everything's fine now. (...) Good point. Your "1. Inside the document if it is an MPD" (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
