 | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Leonardo Zide
|
| | | (...) [snip] I think that your view of ldraw.org should be called 'LCAD community' because it includes people outside ldraw.org, while Tim's view would be the correct definition of ldraw.org. That's the way I see things (but I could be wrong) and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I don't think it's a matter of correct/incorrect/right/wrong. It's a matter of agreeing on the definition for 'ldraw.org'. Or, it's a matter of deciding the parameters for the perimeter of our group, and then deciding on a name for that group. (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Leonardo Zide
|
| | | | (...) I thought there could be both ldraw.org and LCAD, where ldraw.org is a subgroup from the LCAD community. But that's not important now. :) (...) Why not use Lugnet (1) ? We could use it instead of ldraw.org, so we wouldn't need to have any new (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Leonardo Zide" <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message news:39CFBA54.A0214F....com.br... (...) Yup. (...) I still say that we need a dedicated subgroup of Lugnuts to take care of LCAD - whether it pertains to all of LCAD or to just the people (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
