 | | Re: Parts license —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) I haven't contributed many parts to the library, so I've been keeping my trap shut throughout all of this, but I'm a little curious about a few points. What would happen if someone were to create a part but for some reason didn't want it to be (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Parts license —Leonardo Zide
|
| | | | | (...) Why do you think that way ? If the person was writing a new part then he could use any license he wanted but he's using someone else's work and IMO it's fair to give the original author the same rights that he gave you. A person could for (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Parts license —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Maybe we're talking about two different things. If I find a "defective" part and fix it for my own use, why should I have to publish it? I'm not taking credit for anyone else's work, especially since no one else is using it. That would be like (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Parts license —Pat Mahoney
|
| | | | I am sorry to jump in so late. I am the debian packager of LeoCAD. My general thoughts on this follow. I think it would be best to use a common, existing license rather than add to the license soup if at all possible. Of course, one doesn't want to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parts license —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) This is true, however the creation of parts is not merely a mechanical process -- the author does actually go through a creative process to model a part. This is because the author has to choose which details to model and which primitives to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parts license —Pat Mahoney
|
| | | | | (...) Ok. I see your point. (...) (24 years ago, 24-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parts license —Pat Mahoney
|
| | | | | (...) Ok. I see your point. (...) (24 years ago, 24-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parts license —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) This is a good point, and I agree with it. I don't know if it has anything to do with copyright or not. (...) As I understand it (and IANAL), 'copyright' applies to the expression of ideas. So you can hold copyright on a file, which prevents (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parts license —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) I think we have a little latitude, since TYCO, MegaBloks, Block-Men, and others have produced actual bricks of nearly identical dimensions as LEGO. It seems to me that if an actual product can be produced with such close similarity, a virtual (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
