 | | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Ok, lemme try again from a different angle... The distiction I meant was that a distinction is hard to make. That is, if there were an area for "sets" and an area for "elements," it's hard to draw the line (in a few special cases, but not in (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) You're not going to beguile me with your fuzzy-logic thinking here, mister! ;) If you crank the zoom up high enough, every line is blurry. In this case, my feeling is the line is pretty clear. It's almost always obvious whether an assembly of (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) How would you classify a Blacktron I prisoner pod? The exactly same sub- assembly is used 6 times in 5 different sets. It's not really set-specific, but it's certainly not a part, right? I'm not trying to be difficult, I just wanna understand: (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) It w/could be classified as a sub-model. At least, that's how I'd classify it. (...) A line can certainly be drawn. Elements are what's in (or destined to be in) the ldraw\parts directory. Anything else is not a part. Usually, the only files (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | Hey, folks. Now that we're a newsgroup, we should pay more attention to the subject line. (...) I tried to send an extended post on this subject, but I'm not sure where it went. It was basically along the same lines as Steve, though. I would only (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | [meta] Subject Headers (was Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Really? I figured the subject line matters less here, because everything is threaded... Steve (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: [meta] Subject Headers (was Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Maybe John means on output (writing/sending) more than on input (reading)... At least that's how I'd interpret the suggestion...It's certainly OK to change the Subject line on a whim when the topic of the thread changes direction. Makes later (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
