To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 4979
4978  |  4980
Subject: 
Re: Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:44:40 GMT
Viewed: 
84 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Tore Eriksson writes:

I am just a little concerned about the rapidly increasing number of files we produce. It gets harder to overview.

Oh, you're not going to be happy with the next update...

I know nothing about rendering program's cacheing and what effect usage of
sub-files have.

With a good caching strategy, subfiles should make a net improvement in
performance.

There has to be a balance, sub-parts can surely be very handy many times.
For example, I think Steve's subpart s/4186a.dat is very good as it makes the
4186 Baseplate part file at least 40 times smaller. But a primitive with, say
8 x 8 studs would have been more gereric and could decrease the size of many
more part files.

For that part (the original soccer field baseplate), a small
grid of studs was not very useful.  I did try it.

The differences may be of academic importance*, but me I'm interested in not
having too many files that aren't real part files.

There are specific reasons for having multi-part files.  Sometimes it's a
requirement, sometimes it's a judgement call.

And if one day we'll have a live update system of part files, I think all
these sub-part files could likely mess things up.

It's possible, but I don't think it will be a problem.  A live system would
most likely not care about the 'file type', it would just administer files.

*) Academic importance - do you have that idiom? I'm talking about things
that make no noticable difference, but academic
people can spend years discussing and adding points of view...

Yep, we've got that one.  "It's academic".

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...)
 
Well guys, it looks like I need to warm up the 'ol inliner... and off to the LDAO world I go. :-) Steve, is there still any room for more parts in the next update? (As single file parts) I think I still have a coulple I haven't sent yet. Paul (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...)
 
(...) I am just a little concerned about the rapidly increasing number of files we produce. It gets harder to overview. I know nothing about rendering program's cacheing and what effect usage of sub-files have. There has to be a balance, sub-parts (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)

9 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR