To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 4979
4978  |  4980
Subject: 
Re: Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:44:40 GMT
Viewed: 
237 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Tore Eriksson writes:

> I am just a little concerned about the rapidly increasing number of files we produce. It gets harder to overview.

Oh, you're not going to be happy with the next update...

> I know nothing about rendering program's cacheing and what effect usage of
> sub-files have.

With a good caching strategy, subfiles should make a net improvement in
performance.

> There has to be a balance, sub-parts can surely be very handy many times.
> For example, I think Steve's subpart s/4186a.dat is very good as it makes the
> 4186 Baseplate part file at least 40 times smaller. But a primitive with, say
> 8 x 8 studs would have been more gereric and could decrease the size of many
> more part files.

For that part (the original soccer field baseplate), a small
grid of studs was not very useful.  I did try it.

> The differences may be of academic importance*, but me I'm interested in not
> having too many files that aren't real part files.

There are specific reasons for having multi-part files.  Sometimes it's a
requirement, sometimes it's a judgement call.

> And if one day we'll have a live update system of part files, I think all
> these sub-part files could likely mess things up.

It's possible, but I don't think it will be a problem.  A live system would
most likely not care about the 'file type', it would just administer files.

> *) Academic importance - do you have that idiom? I'm talking about things
> that make no noticable difference, but academic
> people can spend years discussing and adding points of view...

Yep, we've got that one.  "It's academic".

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...)
 
Well guys, it looks like I need to warm up the 'ol inliner... and off to the LDAO world I go. :-) Steve, is there still any room for more parts in the next update? (As single file parts) I think I still have a coulple I haven't sent yet. Paul (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...)
 
(...) I am just a little concerned about the rapidly increasing number of files we produce. It gets harder to overview. I know nothing about rendering program's cacheing and what effect usage of sub-files have. There has to be a balance, sub-parts (...) (26 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)

9 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR