LEGO Elements/Parts : 1466


CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 1466	1465 \| 1467

Subject:	Re: New Part - 30200 Windscreen 6 x 6 Octagonal Canopy Base Subpart 1
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date:	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 02:31:24 GMT
Viewed:	1235 times

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Tore Eriksson writes: > > > > 0 > > 0 1 16 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 80 zerobase.dat > > Pardon? Zerobase...? Is that something you use to orient the part? Never mind, it was REMmed out. uh hum... well, I try to remember to remove that line, but once in awhile I forget.. you caught me! take a look at my todo page for some info on this one. http://www.geocities.com/pneaster/lego_todo.htm > > > > 0 > > 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s/30200s01.dat > > 1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s/30200s01.dat > > 0 > > 0 Name: 30200s01.dat > > 0 > > 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s/30200s02.dat > > 0 > > Why three files for one part? > > I see very little reason for not inlining 30200s01 into 30200 (else then saving 21 kb file size), and I see no reason at > all for not just pasting 30200s02 into 30200s01 first. Are these sub-parts going to be re-used in another part, or could > they be differently coloured from the rest of the part? ah...no, not different colors, and doubt they will be re-used. ok. after inlining, the part grows from 24kb to to 42kb. Is that acceptable? I was under the impression that we were to try to keep the size of files to to a minium. Mostly for program cacheing. If this is not so, then I will need to inline the 30209 file as well, also the unposted 30190 wheel as well. > > Oh, I almost forgot the most important: Very nice work, Paul! > > /Tore OH! thanks! :-) Oh, by the way... did anybody notice the part origin on this part? I tried to keep it the same as the mockup. I this needs to be changed, let me know. Also if Anyone else (including Tore ;-) )believes this part needs to inlined, let me know as well. Paul

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: New Part - 30200 Windscreen 6 x 6 Octagonal Canopy Base Subpart 1
(...) Keep in mind that for disk storage, the actual space taken is somewhat more than the actual filesize. For larger files, this extra space is insignificant. But for smaller files, the extra can really add up, depending on the exact situation. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

		Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...)
(...) I am just a little concerned about the rapidly increasing number of files we produce. It gets harder to overview. I know nothing about rendering program's cacheing and what effect usage of sub-files have. There has to be a balance, sub-parts (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: New Part - 30200 Windscreen 6 x 6 Octagonal Canopy Base Subpart 1
(...) Pardon? Zerobase...? Is that something you use to orient the part? Never mind, it was REMmed out. (...) Paul Easter also wrote: (...) Why three files for one part? I see very little reason for not inlining 30200s01 into 30200 (else then (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

9 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search