Subject:
|
Re: Planes for a new download-tool (2)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:39:43 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
RUI.MARTINS@LINK.PTspamcake
|
Viewed:
|
1660 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > > [...SNIP...]
> > > IMO, we don't need multiple domain names for this type of software.
> > Each software developer may want to provide a home (website) for their
> > software !
> >
> > > It all works with the same file system and format,
> >
> > if we are using the HTTP header, this shouldn't be a problem !
>
> I'm not understanding.
I'm speaking about a technicallity, the HTTP protocol, sometimes known as the
web protocol. (see any URL, ex: HTTP:\\www.ldraw.org)
> > [...SNIP...]
> > in maintaining several sites with different software ?
> >
> > This is already beeing done !
>
> I realize that. I'm talking about large websites with their own domains. The
> whole reason for ldraw.org is a site to be central to the DAT file format, and
> supporting whatever software which is developed (with the intent of modelling
> Lego) which utilizes it.
I absolutly agree !
> I'd ask you to please tone down your future replies
> as well.
I never ment to SHOUT ?
I don't know why, but it appears that here at lugnet, from time to time, there
is always someone which finds my reply over Tone.
Is it Me ?
English is Not My mother language, am I not expresing correctly ?
Or are people to touchy ?
What I have I said to be considered annoying or something else ?
I sincerelly haven't written anything with such pretense !
> May I remind you that you did post a private email discussion
> without the concent of both parties, also something that I consider to be
> improper netiquette.
Well, Not trying to start a flame war here, but Only posted a forward of
paragraph, which I tought was interesting to the group. Also Only after sending
you the E-mail, did I find out that I was Not replying to the group, but to you
directly, so I resent it to the the lugnet.
Also, Personal E-Mails are considered "personal", (at least by me), when I
addressed someone on the post or issued the mail directly to his/her
E-mail address only.
[FLAME MODE ON]
Because if People use the "personal" e-mail to flame or make any comments
which they tought weren't correct for the list, then they aren't correct to
send personally also, IMO.
And finally, if I say something publically that someone doesn't like, I
expect that someone to say it publically and Not privatly.
Maybe then I can start to understand which part of my replys are so annoying.
[FLAME MODE OFF]
> > And if we don't need to mess with the server setup (regular HTTP), then its
> > even easyer (like a download directory).
>
> What does this have to do with multiple sites/servers? This would seem to
> argue _against_ your proposal of spreading things out - because there would be
> multiple servers to set up, if I'm understanding that phrase right.
What I mean is:
If to support or be compatible with the Download/Update tool, we just have to
provide and URL to a directory (like "HTTP:\\www.ldraw.org\download") then,
anyone can have a site without worrying about it, because it's as simple as
having a web page.
I hope I explained my self right, this time.
> > But, I don't intent to force any Ldraw users/developers to make this GENERIC
> > software "download tool" that I am talking about.
>
> In all sincerity, you are coming off that way from my perspective.
Sorry If that was the impression, but if I really think that it is a better
solution, I'll obviously try to convince others about it, so that we can all
share it (for the better, but I won't force, or try to force my Ideias to
others, I will only try to convince others why I think it is a better solution.
Maybe I get carried away sometimes, but I think this hasn't been the case here.
> The idea in and of itself is a good one, but the methods of discussion aren't
> the greatest, IMO.
Well, could you please, point out exactly what wasn't so "great".
I' really interested in knowing it ! and I'm serious about it.
Ofcourse I would like a public reply, if you don't mind, so that I can later
reply publicly, ok Tim (and others also ofcourse).
Thanks.
> It would be great if something like this came about, but it would require a
> lot of work for a lot of people.
Maybe it's just about in the next corner.
I will Look into it further.
I' ll be in touch.
See ya
Rui Martins
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Planes for a new download-tool (2)
|
| Rui Martins wrote in message ... (...) the (...) Ok. I'm not saying it would be a problem, but it would be unnecessary. I feel strongly about a central place to download resources for all DAT-compatible software. Just at this moment, the necessary (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Planes for a new download-tool (2) (fwd)
|
| (...) I suppose that this could be discussed, but it wasn't what was originally being discussed. That's where the confusion came in. (...) I'm not understanding. (...) I realize that. I'm talking about large websites with their own domains. The (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
