Subject:
|
Re: Planes & Requirements for a generic download-tool
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Jul 2000 08:59:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
761 times
|
| |
|
|
Ok I do not have a problem with http ... so as it looks we are going to use
http with some informational files ...
just for my understanding ... what the matter with ldraw.org and ftp ? Have
I missed something ?
Michael
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
a75ums4govncm02vtvdbt32f0nc6qj1703@4ax.com...
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Michael Lachmann wrote:
>
> > Yes I know, with Win32 it's easy no matter if it's http or ftp, but is it
> > also under Unix? I would like to keep the source as portable as possible.
> > In general it doesn't depend on the protocol, but getting directory • listings
> > from ftp servers is common and always allowed while on http-servers it's
> > mostly forbidden :-(
>
> We can always either:
>
> a. Enable directory listings for the appropriate directories.
> b. Supply a parts.dir file, containing the directory listing.
>
> BTW, unless something radical changes with the current situation, FTP is
> the wrong way to go for talking to ldraw.org.
>
> Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Planes & Requirements for a generic download-tool
|
| (...) We can always either: a. Enable directory listings for the appropriate directories. b. Supply a parts.dir file, containing the directory listing. BTW, unless something radical changes with the current situation, FTP is the wrong way to go for (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
