 | | Re: Suggestions for new primitives: Flex-System hoses.
|
|
(...) OK. According to Jim Hughes (via the Technica Element Registry) both the flex-system tubing and the corrugated tubing 'are widely available in many lengths'. So should we make a single "Technic Flex Tube" piece, and a single "Technic (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestions for new primitives: Flex-System hoses.
|
|
(...) I can do that, and post the results soon on lugned.cad.dat.parts. Note that you will not find any hoses that are exactly 120 LDU long: They normally come in somewhat "odd" lengths. As for the ribbed tube, the best way to find the length of one (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestions for new primitives: Flex-System hoses.
|
|
(...) I've posted these now. The word "primitive" in the subject is probably not the correct term: "sub part" is probably better. Here's the example files with descriptions and the individual sub parts in MPD format: (2 URLs) latter also has an (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestions for new primitives: Flex-System hoses.
|
|
(...) Yeah, I'll run the primitive past the committee. A couple of things stand out immediately: - The primitive's name should be 4-4con8.dat, not 4-4co89.dat. - Primitives (especially the curved variety) should go to 4 decimal places. Actually, I (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
