 | | Re: comments on parts up for vote- part jg1
|
|
(...) Wrong, chris. There are at least 3 parts left to do. (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) Hmm. That sounds workable. (...) Portable Java would be best... (...) I agree, I just don't see how flexible parts can be coded in LDraw. If you've got some ideas in this direction, I'd love to see them. The lack of flex in LDraw parts is a (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) My comments (that have not already been mentioned) ... 2494p01.dat Does this exist as a printed part, or is this really a sticker? 2552.dat The edge lines on the underside do not seem to line up with the boundaries of the quads. 30044.dat (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: comments on parts up for vote- part jg1
|
|
(...) [ detail snippped ] (...) Thanks a lot for tracking these down - I guess its clear how I generated all these from one master pattern (with the error)! I'll fix them all and send updates to Steve. The one remaining part is the 3x6 shallow slope (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) I'll fix the singular matrices - this was authored before L3Lab was publicly available. It was also done in the expectation that the matching door-frame would be sent in for the voting (don't remember who by). Maybe I'll put that on my work (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote in message news:Pine.GSU.4.10.1...0@is-sv... (...) Superimposed polys are allowed, AFAIK. Maybe not the most elegant solution, but they render fine. (...) petals, (...) better (...) aprxomiation (...) I've (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
Another file - [3471.dat] This file has a lot of work on it, but still has some problems, specifically almost all the quads from the base are bowties. See the following image: (URL) there are a few (maybe many, but few as far as our yes can see) (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I have been able to test only a few parts iet, but here are my findings: - [flowers.dat] This file shows superimposed polys (tris and quads) in the petals of the flower, this is a problem in the flower itself (3742.dat), not in the flowers.dat (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone modeling the Battle Droid?
|
|
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:38F49719.9B288B...ail.com... (...) I'll (...) Nah, it's too much of a pain. Too many intersecting cylinders. The R2 body might be a good candidate for Marc with his real CAD program. (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone modeling the Battle Droid?
|
|
(...) Please finish the r2 unit first, ok. (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Anyone modeling the Battle Droid?
|
|
Has anyone done any work on the battle droid fig parts? If not, I think I'll make an attempt. -John Van (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I haven't tried any of this but wouldn't Hermite curves work better ? Bezier curves don't need to go through the control points (except for the endpoints) and Hermite curves also have the advantage of letting you specify the tangent vector for (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: comments on parts up for vote- part jg1
|
|
(...) OOps. My list should have read 3 x 6 & 3 x 4 not 1 x 6 & 1 x 4. (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: comments on parts up for vote- part jg1
|
|
(...) I don't know about those 2 parts but I have a 3x6 slope with the classic space logo here. Leonardo (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 2
|
|
(...) Thanks, I'll look into this. I also noticed one flaw myself. The cross axle hole does not have a bottom; you can see the internals of the part when looking down the axle hole. Adding a 1/2 disc at the end of the cross axle hole should fix (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I think I disagree with you. I've found the Bezier curves to be a good model for how the flexible axles bend in real life. But it is important to have a correct model for the flexible part in the first place. While the notched end parts are (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
WOW the millenium update? could it be? LOL good job steve! Tburger (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) OK, this is fixed now. Steve (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) OK, the zip file is there. It contains all parts, primitives, and subparts. Find it at: (URL) Steve (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO incompatibliity with Win2k? (was:Re: l3p hates me)
|
|
Ok, fixed this problem. After a better and more careful look at what NTFilemon told me, I decided to create another LDraw directory within my current LDraw directory. I also now seem to remember this problem happening originally as well. Thanks for (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
