Subject:
|
Re: What would you want in a new LEGO(R) CAD System?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:31:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
918 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox325.swipnet.se>
wrote:
> If it makes parts authoring more complicated, I'm against! The .DAT format has some weak points that needs refining, but
> the strongest point is the relatively low learning threshold.
I agree with Tore here. There is a trememdous amount of parts out for
LDraw now and the .dat file format is unquestionably the most popular
system for creating virtual Lego models on the internet. I would be
against developing a new system separate from LDraw, when the system
fulfills the community's needs. Until TLG comes out with a CAD system
that fits our needs like LDraw does and offers trememdous improvement,
I believe LDraw will remain to be the standard.
Pretty much, I tend to downplay any unofficial system which tries to
compete with LDraw. :)
-Tim
http://www.zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What would you want in a new LEGO(R) CAD System?
|
| (...) Same here--before I switch to something other than LEdit for modeling, the program I switch to will have to support ALL Ledit shortcut keys AND be faster. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: What would you want in a new LEGO(R) CAD System?
|
| (...) Using LDS Syntax as is or modified is OK with me. (...) I recall BrickCAD as used by a person that was contacted by lawyers from TLG was more or less forced him to abandon the project. It is possible that TLG will not tolerate a new L-CAD (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
