 | | Re: Using parts in p\48\ (was: part 2951, more questions, nearly done) —John Jensen
| | | | (...) Uhhh I see:) Well that explains my problems then. (...) Hmm Why to the segment? Or is the vague idea I have about inlining completely wrong? I think of it as a tool to put an unofficial primitive into the part file, e.g. by replacing a type 1 (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Using parts in p\48\ (was: part 2951, more questions, nearly done) —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | (...) I think what Steve Bliss meant was to use inlining as a tool _only_ to find out where to put the polygon spanning the final 7° of the curve. You only need to temporarily inline the last curve segment and check the coordinates of the polygon on (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Using parts in p\48\ (was: part 2951, more questions, nearly done) —John Jensen
| | | | | (...) hmm okay, I simply calculated the coordinates, sine and cosine relations are our friends:) (...) Yes I will really have to look in to that, I might require some help setting it up, the only time I touched my .emacs file was when installing (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Using parts in p\48\ (was: part 2951, more questions, nearly done) —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | (...) Sure, no problem. I prefer to inline and find the true coordinates of the polygons in the primitives, though. There may be some small rounding errors both in your sine calculations and in LEdit's, and if they don't match, you'll get small (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
