To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 3524
3523  |  3525
Subject: 
Re: General Comments to MLCad
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 21 Dec 1999 15:55:43 GMT
Viewed: 
117 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Todd Lehman wrote:

In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Steve Bliss writes:
It would be better (IMO) to format non-LDraw information as LDraw-style
meta-commands, and keep everything in the DAT format.  That gives the file
the widest transportability between programs.

Ahh, "tagged" information then, in other words?  :)  Cool.......

Yep.  LDLite does things like

0 COLOR <color definition information>

along with other stuff,

and the HTML instruction generator in LDAO recognizes a subassembly statement:

0 SUB <file> <layout options>

and in lugnet.cad.dev, we're proposing to do BFC-related stuff on
meta-statements like:

0 BFC <backface culling options>

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: General Comments to MLCad
 
(...) Ahh, "tagged" information then, in other words? :) Cool....... --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)

9 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR