To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 3514
3513  |  3515
Subject: 
Re: General Comments to MLCad
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Mon, 20 Dec 1999 21:22:18 GMT
Viewed: 
121 times
  
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Steve Bliss writes:
It would be better (IMO) to format non-LDraw information as LDraw-style
meta-commands, and keep everything in the DAT format.  That gives the file
the widest transportability between programs.

Ahh, "tagged" information then, in other words?  :)  Cool.......

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: General Comments to MLCad
 
(...) Yep. LDLite does things like 0 COLOR <color definition information> along with other stuff, and the HTML instruction generator in LDAO recognizes a subassembly statement: 0 SUB <file> <layout options> and in lugnet.cad.dev, we're proposing to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: General Comments to MLCad
 
(...) It would be better (IMO) to format non-LDraw information as LDraw-style meta-commands, and keep everything in the DAT format. That gives the file the widest transportability between programs. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)

9 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR