Subject:
|
Re: My proposal for new element orientation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:11:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2027 times
|
| |
|
|
Since this was posted to .cad instead of .cad.dev, here it is again:
> Many Lego elements have no discernable front, rear or side... after
> all, some see a 4x2 brick's front as being the 2x end, others will see
> the front as the 4x length.
There is the word "LEGO" on the studs... we could orient pieces so that
"LEGO" is right-side up when seen from the front 3/4 view (for pieces
with studs up, of course)
> The only thing we tend to inherently agree
> on is that studs are on top.
Not if you've read Karim's blurb about how he builds :)
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: My proposal for new element orientation
|
| (...) This would contradict some existing standards. For example, all 2xN bricks and plates currently have the N oriented on the X axis. Under the stud-logo orientation, they'd have to all be rotated 90-degrees. Also, the stud-logo should be (...) (28 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: My proposal for new element orientation
|
| That won't work all the time. In the L3G0 library, the rule was the vertical axis should pass through the center of the bottom-left stud when the brick is held such that the "LEGO" logo is right-side-up, and the bottom of the brick rested on the (...) (28 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
