Subject:
|
Re: My proposal for new element orientation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 16:48:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2062 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:11:52 GMT, Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> wrote:
> Since this was posted to .cad instead of .cad.dev, here it is again:
>
> > Many Lego elements have no discernable front, rear or side... after
> > all, some see a 4x2 brick's front as being the 2x end, others will see
> > the front as the 4x length.
>
> There is the word "LEGO" on the studs... we could orient pieces so that
> "LEGO" is right-side up when seen from the front 3/4 view (for pieces
> with studs up, of course)
This would contradict some existing standards. For example, all 2xN
bricks and plates currently have the N oriented on the X axis. Under
the stud-logo orientation, they'd have to all be rotated 90-degrees.
Also, the stud-logo should be oriented so that the top of the logo is
directed toward the front (or top, depending on the part) of the
LDraw-world. This would require the logo to appear upside-down in
LDraw's default view.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My proposal for new element orientation
|
| Since this was posted to .cad instead of .cad.dev, here it is again: (...) There is the word "LEGO" on the studs... we could orient pieces so that "LEGO" is right-side up when seen from the front 3/4 view (for pieces with studs up, of course) (...) (...) (28 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
