| |
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message
news:37B5A8FA.53861CF3@voyager.net...
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> writes:
> >
> > > [...] but neither is he firable in the work sense. [...]
> >
> > For sociological reasons, yes?
This is the type of thing I've been worried about. Is this doing more harm
or good.
I am a relatively new part author (1 year of experience). I'm working on a
part right now (the crossbow) that I have mindboggling questions about, but
I am holding off because I hate the idea of fitting into Jonathan's mold of
a new part author. To this end I've been killing myself for the past 2
weeks trying to figure out why most of my line/plane intersect equations
work and 4 don't AAGHHH! And I've been afraid to post any 'annoying'
questions because look how Jonathan's posts have been taken. In my mind all
of this has turned our wonderful nurturing group into a be-on-guard and
watch your posts group.
We're talking about ostracizing someone. How many people here have felt
ostracized by one group or another? Haven't we all? Now it seems lugnet is
going to be that way too.
True he's posted rude and annoying messages in the past, that's just his
nature and he may not intend them that way. He has a big red target painted
on him and I feel bad thinking that his feelings are really being hurt by
all these discussions- yes, I'm being sappy, that's just my emotional state
right now. And yes, he may deserve all this, but why should everyone else
stoop to this level of rudeness?
Thanks for reading,
Adam
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) Absolutely. It goes on frequently in the world. (...) Ideally, it should be for the good of both. Hurting another's feelings isn't the issue (though it happens), and it never should be when there are things to be gained by both sides in a (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| If you post a message along the lines of "I'm trying to make the crossbow and I am having trouble getting the intersection of where the loop folds into the stock, here's what I tried to do 1. bla 2. bla 3. bla That worked for me when I intersected (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) Suggestions for asking questions: Be as specific as possible. In this case, you are working on a specific detail, so you could post the part, with the problem-areas marked by comments: 0 *** The following 4 lines don't work right *** <bad line (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) *Shift* Key Tom.... :) (Or is it ;-) ) :P (and call me stupid cause its only on my way to pressing the send button that I found the 'yanospamhoo' - where's the spamcake? Spamcaaaaake! Spamcaaaaake!!) -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) For logical reasons. To be fired, you have to be employed, or at least there has to be some sort of fixed arrangement that you can be dismissed from (you can be fired from a volunteer job, but you can't be "fired" from hanging around the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
