To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 262 (-10)
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) Oops, sorry. Steve (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) I have not yet finished reviewing the parts, so I haven't voted yet. Steve (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) Yes, very much. (...) Y,VM. Steve (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Noting gaps in parts sequences
 
(...) Uh-huh.. Converts capital I to capital I. How eville. Jasper (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  RE: DAT voting page up
 
John VanZwieten explained excellently: (...) That's the way to do it! POV-Ray doesn't like coincident surfaces either. /Lars (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) tag? (...) You might be right about this one. It's a small part with rather oddly rounded surfaces. I'll take another look at it. (...) OK, and I'll also implement the use of sub-parts to separate the front face. If anyone has the triangle (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
Wow. I at least keep Lego around the house so I can tell myself I play with Ldraw to make records of my son's and my creations :-) A suggestion: if there is a difficult pattern or part you want to work on, ask around here for someone willing to loan (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
Chris Dee wrote in message ... (...) (425p01) (...) do (...) redefine (...) with, (...) An example: Adding a white rectangle to a color 16 surface: 1. Delete the color 16 surface from the part. 2. Add the white rectangle. 3. Fill in the area around (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  RE: My proposal for the orientation of new elements
 
(...) I believe that all bricks, tiles, plates, and all parts with studs on top have y=0 just below the studs and above the "body"? /Lars (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: My proposal for the orientation of new elements
 
(...) We already have a convention for this, I think. Parts with studs should have the top of the part (excluding the studs) in the X-Z-plane, and otherwise be centered. Of course, special parts need special rules. An example is the "joystick" (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR