|
|
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) Just view them in LDraw (Over left front) at 50% and you should see (they do render OK in LDLite). Basically what has been done in the past is to redefine the entire part, missing out (fromn the colour 16 definitions) the area of surface which (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Suggestions for JJM
|
| (...) No problem. I'm going to be wrapping up the main zacktron.com interface and indroducing the new ring site, I will be happy to display the banner on the ring site as well. Also, I can add it to the ring's new resource links section, even though (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) These are mine. i have not had any rendering problems so tell me the positon and size of the problem. (...) i was not aware of this... thanks for the tip. (...) That was probobly my fault... but does it really matter? (...) does it really (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) A big update - and welcome to some new names - great work. I have some comments on the new parts: Airport Runway baseplates (606p33, 608p33) and Crosswalk Baseplate (425p01) These appear to have been authored by concurrently defining the white (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| A note on the 9V Mini-motor: There is a box3#8.dat primitive which Ldlite is currently unable to draw. This primitive forms the wire notch on the top of the motor, but since the voting page is done with Ldlite, a hole exixts. Terry, maybe you could (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
