 | | Re: Parts Database (Was: Idea: ... Lego piece naming convention?) —Tore Eriksson
| | | | Ah, yet another promising database variant! This is great, and fast! I only see one problem with it is it only includes official LDraw elements. Isn't there any way we could make .DAT files for not yet rendered parts, too? Just for database (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Parts Database (Was: Idea: ... Lego piece naming convention?) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Creating shell .DAT files is a simple way to record information for parts which haven't been created for LDraw. I wouldn't include these shell files in the L-CAD parts updates, but they would be useful for building a parts-base. (...) That (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Parts Database (Was: Idea: ... Lego piece naming convention?) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) How about a 0 IMAGE meta-command, for those parts which are not-yet coded? That way, we could supply a URL for all parts, and the image could come from any source. Of course, it might make more sense to have that particular item as a column in (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
