To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 2197 (-10)
  Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
 
It gives me a broken link when I click on the installer Steve Bliss wrote in message <37793e92.94991@lugnet.com>... (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
 
Oops. Gotta remember to check all groups before posting. . . (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
 
After I downloaded the new version of LDAO, I noticed one problem. In the VEC, the only piece that did show up was one that I had moved to a different catergory. It didn't tell me to update the Vec or anything, and all the images were there. I tried (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
 
Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message news:377c79d9.335312...net.com... (...) update (...) how (...) be (...) the (...) as (...) I think we should allow stickers. Granted they won't look spectacular in LDraw or LDLite right now, but (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Mindstorm Part Numbers
 
thinks... another re-numbering of the minifig torso :) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: 3840p01 Minifig Vest with Danger Stripes Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
 
(...) I recall a long thread about this back on LCAD. I thought we agreed then that stickers should be treated as separate "parts", since they can in theory be stuck anywhere. It kind of got held up because sticker "parts" have only a very small (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
 
(...) Something to consider here is future expansion into a UNIX-ish (or Java, or Perl/TK, etc.) version of LDraw. The availability of setting startup parameters on the command-line in these cases is essential. (...) Oh. :-, I wonder if I'm a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
 
(...) One problem I have with the command-line option is that the command line is already long enough. But that doesn't mean that having the option is bad. (...) I was worried about the user more than the developer. (...) In VB, there's a function (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
 
(...) Definitely. (...) Both IMHO are necessary. I do all my non-LDAO (which is quite a bit) LDraw/LDLite stuff from the command-line. VC++ doesn't make it *that* hard to implement exotic command-line parameters, especially if one uses getopt(). I (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
 
(...) Well, I went and checked again, and you were right about Mover eating the first on each line of header comments. That's been fixed. I've *got* to make Mover do recursive corrections (ie, fix submodels). And directory-wide operations. Steve (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR