 | | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
(...) None that I know of. If we can all agree on a general definition of these two meta-commands, I will add support for them to LDAO. My current definition for the meta-commands are (note: I've violated at least some of these rules): 0 CATEGORY (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
(...) I'll try. I haven't looked through my L-CAD archive so the answers will be slightly vague. (...) None that I know of, but I expect it to be added to the parts searcher soon. (...) I think CATEGORY was intended for things that belonged in (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDAO eating header comments
|
|
Hey Steve, i've noticed over the last couple of days, while modeling all these wheels/tires that LDAO is doing something evil to my header lines... my max2dat export proggy automatically puts these lines in after the standard part/filename/author (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
Hello all, I'm thinking of adding a keywords line to my (updated) part files, but I don't know much about the functionality of this feature. A look in the FAQ didn't help me either. Could someone answer these questions I have ? 1. What programs use (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
(...) Oops, sorry. Didn't read your post closely enough... Steve (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36cc614e.2128629@lu...et.com>... (...) was (...) Why not Mac users? If LDLite was on the LUGNET server, it could just send the output as a .gif file or such. It would be slower, of course, but wouldn't require a local (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
(...) Except Mac users... Steve (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
Paul, do you have plans to make LDLite compatable with the MPD format? I was reminded of this by the tyre posts to lugnet.cad. I think this would be a major improvement as far as the usefulness of lugnet.cad.dat. Of course the other major (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [makelist] - Re: mklist v1.0 ready for testing
|
|
Hello Lars, I've been able to run mklist.exe on my MS-DOS 6.2 based machine at home, and also on a Windows NT 4.00 based machine at work. Your program works fine on both of them. If you are able to make it sub-sort the identical descriptions on (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) I can speak on this. Japan uses either y-d-m or d-m-y in modern forms. Traditionally (and still in some traditional circles) the Year is expressed in reference to the current ruling emperor, so the year that I was there (1996) was actually (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
