Subject:
|
Re: 99-03 Voting: Quick Comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 May 1999 16:05:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
722 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 12 May 1999 04:21:10 GMT, Joshua Delahunty
<dulcaoin@alumni.cse.ucsc.edu> wrote:
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> > 3705C01.DAT (Technic Axle 4 Threaded):
> > - Why the C01 suffix? This doesn't appear to be a compound part...
> > 3737C01.DAT (Technic Axle 10 Threaded):
> > - Ditto
>
> This was a numbers group suggestion. These only come in 7xxxx codes
> (and hence, only in black), but Terry really wanted to release them
> color-16. Rather than use 3-digit codes for this, we based them off the
> codes for the non-threaded version of each axle, so they'd group
> nicely. Plus, from a certain point of view, these ARE regular items
> that have been modified, and so fit in the new C grouping (since we only
> have P and C); much as a chromed item is a normal element that's had
> something special done to it.
Rilly? Those axles were machined after they were molded, to add the
threads? Cool.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 99-03 Voting: Quick Comments
|
| (...) I wish I knew for a _fact_ that this is (was) the case, but I can't say so with any certainty. I would suppose that using an existing mold to create an axle, and then cutting threads into the element, makes a lot more sense than trying to (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 99-03 Voting: Quick Comments
|
| (...) This was a numbers group suggestion. These only come in 7xxxx codes (and hence, only in black), but Terry really wanted to release them color-16. Rather than use 3-digit codes for this, we based them off the codes for the non-threaded version (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
