 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Roy Earls
|
| | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <36c84429.9637535@lu...et.com>... (...) Since it would be a random function, wouldn't you need to generate the mesh each time the element is used? Seems like a lot of work for one part, but how would you interface with (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Just generate the mesh once. The part-file would be static, with one rough/broken side. It's still a lot of work for just one element -- it'd be easier to take the existing part-file, and just break it in half. Steve (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Roy Earls
|
| | | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <36c978b2.2064646@lu...et.com>... (...) I think I'll table that question for now and work on developing a version of the old element. It appears that the element in LDRAW is of the newer type. Once we have that we'll (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Roy, Did you ever finish that part? I dropped by your web-page, once upon a time, and it seemed like the file was there for downloading. If it's complete, you should submit for the next parts update. Steve (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Roy Earls
|
| | | | | ----Original Message----- From: Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> Newsgroups: lugnet.cad.dev (...) It's not complete in respect to Type 2 and 5 lines. The conversion program works, but the modeler I use refuses to output lines into a DXF or VSA (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't need the part, I just remember it was a part that came up during a discussion on whether part-variations were important or not. (...) To be perfectly serious, for this part, I'd copy the existing 4081.dat and modify it. The only change (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Roy Earls
|
| | | | | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <3715f8f5.7183451@lu...et.com>... (...) In this case, the difference can make a world of difference. (...) and (...) Again, Steve, I'm sorry when I wrote the above my mind was thinking about the problems I'm having (...) (26 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Abuse (was: Re: Non-TLG Parts) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) jw is being abused not because his parts stink, but because his attitude does. If someone else performed exactly the same actions jw has, but more appropriate language, they wouldn't be abused at all. Steve (26 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Abuse (was: Re: Non-TLG Parts) —Roy Earls
|
| | | | | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <3717595d.1405512@lu...et.com>... (...) Normally I would agree, but the situation has gotten to the point where I can't tell which side of the question is worse. JW certainly comes off as rough around the edges, but his (...) (26 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Roy Earls
|
| | | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <37159959.67882274@l...et.com>... (...) of (...) in (...) Sorry, Steve, I should have read the message more carefully, but I'm not functioning at 100% this morning. I haven't considered putting the 4081 "old version" up (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
