 | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —John VanZwieten
|
| | | Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3736dc07.459525...net.com... (...) The (...) center (...) The (...) Maybe I could work up a spreadsheet to calculate (based on the total length of the spring) the correct compression of (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) i'm not sure if you and steve are completely clear on what terry and i are concerned about... and even if the two of you are, i'll lay it out for everyone else that might be hazy on why this "compression" "no compression" "scaling" etc etc etc (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | onyx <onyx@flash.net> wrote in message news:FBJEHG.E04@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) Yup, undoubtedly more than my attempt at explaination. I think if you gave us correctly scaled coils at 100 LDU, 80 LDU, 60 LDU, and 50 LDU, we could use (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) versions (...) btw, after i posted i came across another message of yours where you *had* grasped the rub in this situation... hmmm... i think that might be a decent idea... modeling various compressions would be painless.. i could tear them (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
