 | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Terry Keller
|
| | | (...) Leave it to Karim to be clever. :-) A very interesting idea. I am somewhat chagrined to have not thought of it myself. The only difficulty is the precise rotation needed. But I expect that the simplest way of using this assembly will be by (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) i *am* reading (although i've been out of the loop for a couple of weeks, had to go off and be "best man" at my best friend's wedding)... i *like* karim's idea... but... i don't know if that would just be complicating a process that we could (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | In lugnet.cad.dev, Jeff Boen writes: one last addition on this subject from me... the only drawback to my method of custom building a spring of X length, made from the existing subparts, is that no matter how "compressed" the spring was in your (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
