 | | Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Terry Keller
|
| | | Hi all, As any of you that have gone to the piece voting page know, there is a problem that needs to be resolved concerning the large Technic shock piece. To (sorta) quote from the page: ---...---start---...--- There is a problem with this piece. We (...) (26 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | (...) I have a fourth idea. It's a bit difficult to explain, but I'll try to make it clear: There would be a total of 3 pieces to make up the shock: A) Shock lower w/ half of spring B) Shock upper C) Spring upper half Since the spiral is fairly (...) (26 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Leave it to Karim to be clever. :-) A very interesting idea. I am somewhat chagrined to have not thought of it myself. The only difficulty is the precise rotation needed. But I expect that the simplest way of using this assembly will be by (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) i *am* reading (although i've been out of the loop for a couple of weeks, had to go off and be "best man" at my best friend's wedding)... i *like* karim's idea... but... i don't know if that would just be complicating a process that we could (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | In lugnet.cad.dev, Jeff Boen writes: one last addition on this subject from me... the only drawback to my method of custom building a spring of X length, made from the existing subparts, is that no matter how "compressed" the spring was in your (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
