 | | Re: Star Wars light sabre blade
|
|
(...) I assumed it was a artifact from the molding process (like the two circles which are on the other side of the blade from the notch). I didn't really consider modeling it in. It wouldn't be hard to do, but I'm not seeing the benefit. Steve (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars light sabre blade
|
|
Steve, Did you consider modeling the little notch near one end of the blade? I realize it's probably right at the 1ldu threshold and probably doesn't matter when using it, but... -John Van Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Program to create TLG style instructions from .dat files
|
|
(...) That would be nice. It'd be easier than making a separate file of the half-completed part, putting in a series of 0 CLEAR / upside-down view / 0 STEP / 0 CLEAR / right-side up view lines. (...) LDAO supports this, to one level (no (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst [DAT]
|
|
(...) If part 1234.dat was ~Moved to 5678.dat, when LDAO updates 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1234.dat it shouldn't just cut out the 1234 and paste in 5678. It should inline this line (skipping any comment lines, of course). This would have the (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
|
(...) Sorry, forgot that. I have always wondered why people would sort by number (filename). (...) You tell me when. (...) Yes and Yes. I think that "~Moved to" is a keyword comparable to "STEP" and "ROTATE" and should be taken very literally. (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
|
(...) It would be very simple to do so. If you sort by filename, the ~Moved to parts are all intermingled with the rest of the parts. When you go to the parts.lst in LEdit, you don't even really need to pay a lot of attention to the descriptions - (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
|
(...) (whew!) Glad my assumption was correct. :-) (...) Huh? What do you mean by inline operation? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Shell Extension DLL for lcd and dat files
|
|
(...) But this is very useful! Thank you. However, I often get too much information shown, apparently some text left over from the previous part if it had a longer description. E.g. for part 3001.dat: "Brick 2 x 4 with Black Grille Pattern" in stead (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Program to create TLG style instructions from .dat files
|
|
(...) I had forgoten about LeoCAD. That must be where I orignally saw this. (...) Very nice. Thanks again. Owen. (...) (26 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Program to create TLG style instructions from .dat files
|
|
(...) Have you ever tried the HTML export from LeoCAD ? It has an option to do exactly that. (...) You can do that too, take a look at the step 5 from the sample I've uploaded to (URL) (...) That's a little more complicated. (...) You can choose if (...) (26 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
