 | | Augh! How to make sure parts-stuff is current?
|
|
Hey, y'all: I'm working on adding a feature to LDAO which verifies that parts.lst and the VEC directory are up-to-date. I started to write this post asking if it was worth the effort, but now I'm wondering what steps are even necessary. I think it (...) (26 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) I'm inclined to say so, esp. since so much has been posted to this sub-tree already. (...) No, separate the discussions from these groups. It's extremely frustrating to find source when it's scattered amongst ten times more messages discussing (...) (26 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
|
(...) I really doubt people choose a "~Moved to xxx.dat" part when browsing in LEdit! Why should they? It doesn't have a description, so how would you know what part it is? If people are using "~Moved to" parts, it must be because they thought they (...) (26 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
|
(...) I double-checked this, and what Terry says is true for LDAO. Which is good. The bad news is that LDAO simply replaces the old part number with the new part number. It should be doing an inline operation. Steve (26 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | three wheeler piece
|
|
Has any one made the three wheeler peice (or a mockup, i just need the main part not the front forks) yet? I would check the parts tracker but I lost the link. The reason for the peice is this, I found a way to build them up into really cool (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
