 | | Re: L3P support of extended metacommands?
|
|
(...) Cool! Thanks. :) (...) Yep, the 'fixed' version of the 1x1 cone looks much better now. (...) When do you expect that you will be able to release this as a 'real version'? Steve (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
(...) That wouldn't work all the time. Imagine that you have 2 parts at the exact same location, if I allow a small margin the program would think that they are not touching each other. (...) That's the only solution I found so far, couldn't think (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) Apparently not. (...) That's not the one I did. (...) There were at least a couple of different accessory packs like this. Steve (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
i am listening to the group. i will do everything i can to accually get some lego to work from. at the monent i have a bag of lego (not mine) that i am looking at, but all the parts that guy had that were not in ldraw are too hard IMHO to model e.g. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: L3P support of extended metacommands?
|
|
(...) I think that this someone was me! I made the TRANSLATE/ROTATE/SCA.../TRANSFORM support two month ago, but have been very busy at work since then. I need further testing of other new features and the perpetual doc writing. But here you have a (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
(...) This would be my bet too. Allow for a small margin/overlap caused by rounding errors. Since you cannot tell anything about inside/outside of a part but only have a bunch of faces (triangles and quads), the idea of comparing every face in one (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDAO - Temp Location
|
|
(...) <snipped details> Wow. Lots of little things fixed. Big THANKS. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
(...) Agreed. Ditto. What Todd said. I second that. In spades. Jonathan, you have been reading these types of comments for quite a while now. Has _any_ of it sunk in? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
|
(...) <snipped "summary"> <following not to be taken seriously in any way> Summarize? I started to read that "summary" and quickly sensed something amiss. Glancing up at the subject header, I noted the length of the post - 186 lines. Whoa! That is (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
I just had a good idea for simplifying posting of .dat files to cad.dat. - at least for users of Forte's Agent. Maybe this could work for other newsreaders? As most of you are aware, when posting .dat files you should increase your line length in (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
