 | | Re: Clone "semi-bricks" (Was: Non-TLG Parts) —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) That was the opinion stated by Jacob, which I generally agree with, but it depends on the detail in question. Some common, details which are larger than 1LDU details and are skipped in LDraw parts: - the indentations on the undersides of (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Proper tiles (Was: Clone "semi-bricks" (Was: Non-TLG Parts)) —Jeremy H. Sproat
| | | | | (...) Ya know, this has been one of my pet peeves with LDraw. But since I'm too lazy to learn how to create pieces, I haven't said anything about it until now. Would anyone have the time, inclination, and patience to "fix" the 4 dozen or so Tile (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Proper tiles (Was: Clone "semi-bricks" (Was: Non-TLG Parts)) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | | (...) Sure, no problem, I'll get right on it. At the same time, I'll also shave the excess 1LDU off the ends of all the cross-axles, OK? ;) Steve (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Proper tiles (Was: Clone "semi-bricks" (Was: Non-TLG Parts)) —Chris Dee
| | | | | (...) Actually, this adds weight to our recent use of subpart files for the non- decorated sections of parts which are frequently decorated. If this had been done from the start (no criticism implied) we would now only have to "fix" the subparts - (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
