Subject:
|
Re: POV-Ray help needed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:02:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12914 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Roland Melkert wrote:
> > Also you may be interested in knowing that I now also have a basic
> > "hierarchical compositions" export in place (no lgeo, no primitive
> > substitutions (yet)). And it seems the mesh2 approach, i used before, is
> > about 15-20% faster on bigger models. So I keep that option in the final
> > version for faster test runs.
>
> Thanks for the info. I have implemented mesh2 support in LDView's export as
> part of my new curve smoothing support for POV exports, but haven't completely
> removed the mesh support (although it is currently hard-coded to use mesh2
> whether or not curve smoothing is enabled). If mesh2 is generally faster, I'll
> probably just leave it as the only option.
I forgot the beginning of this thread, and misunderstood your "15% faster"
comment. I see now that you're referring to the flattened mesh2 data for the
part. I was mis-reading it to be that mesh2 is 15% faster than mesh (which I
know you never said or implied anywhere).
It sounds like I should give the user the option of doing this as well. Since I
already do it when curve smoothing is enabled, I just need to allow it to happen
with curve smoothing disabled, and then simply skip the actual curve smoothing
step.
--Travis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: POV-Ray help needed
|
| (...) Thanks for the info. I have implemented mesh2 support in LDView's export as part of my new curve smoothing support for POV exports, but haven't completely removed the mesh support (although it is currently hard-coded to use mesh2 whether or (...) (16 years ago, 9-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
