|
|
 | | Re: BFC and Primitives
|
| I quote Michael Lachmann, from MLCad file ReleaseNotes.txt: Beginning with release V2.00 MLCad does no longer support BFC. However the metacommand itself is still supported but has no effect on drawing (BFC - BackFaceCulling was an experiment on (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: BFC and Primitives
|
| (...) Some of those tools ( I know MLCad can use them ) already support them. On top of that those are not the only tools around! (...) This is just not true. In my program it make a big deal. In general, anytime you can quickly narrow down the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: BFC and Primitives
|
| (...) IMHO, i don't consider BFC statements as an important ldraw issue, for following reasons: 1. Popular tools do not use these statements (including LDraw, MLCad, LDView and L3P & POV-ray). L3Lab use them but L3Lab is superceded by LDView both in (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: bug report - "file check" program @ LCAD parts tracker
|
| (...) I tried using Netscape 6, and I couldn't duplicate your problem. I'll keep my eye on this. Steve (24 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | BFC and Primitives
|
| Dear All (but mostly PT Reviewers), I'd like to update all the current primitive files to be BFC compliant. This wouldn't be a huge task, at least for the geometric primitives (boxes, circles, discs, rings, cones, cylinders, and torii). But when I (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
