 | | Re: Name suggestions for L3DView
|
|
How about LViewGL? The GL of course for the OpenGL graphics engine that is used to render it. -Chuck (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3DView v0.5 view LDraw models in real-time 3D
|
|
(...) I couldn't agree more, you don't have anything to loose by making the source code available, you might even get some help from other people (I've contributed small patches to LDLite and LDGLite for example). I've said that before but I'll say (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Name suggestions for L3DView
|
|
Lars Hassing (author of L3P and L3Lab) pointed out that the name L3DView might incorrectly lead people to believe that it is somehow related to L3P and L3Lab, causing confusion. While I chose the name to stand for LDraw 3D Viewer (or optionally LEGO (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3DView v0.5 view LDraw models in real-time 3D
|
|
(...) I used a BSP to avoid that problem in LeoCAD, works really well. (...) If you want to have the optional lines then you should transform the coordinates yourself, using gluProject is not a good idea (glu functions should be avoided as much as (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3DView v0.5 view LDraw models in real-time 3D
|
|
(...) Rats! I don't know how many times I've heard that. "I'll release the source after I clean it up." L3lab, Ldlite 2.0, MLCAD? What is so embarrasing about developmental code? It's not like dirty underwear. Doesn't anyone realize that nobody EVER (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
