To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / *5090 (-10)
  Re: next ldraw part update, space/minifig accessories?
 
hi steve, and thanks for the response. i've been watching the voting thread. in your original announcement you said it would be a "fairly small update" of parts but that is one jam-packed update of great stuff! big thanks to you and all of the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
 
(...) I'd say it would be ok even then, imo. (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)  
 
  Re: LDraw Help Desk/Reference
 
Tim, I thought you once mentioned an 'under development' area on ldraw.org. Does this area exist, or am I mis-remembering? Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: next ldraw part update, space/minifig accessories?
 
(...) Yes. :) (...) At some point, the parts in the Castle, Town, and Space categories need to be reorganized, moved to other categories. Generally, the theme-based groups make parts harder to find. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
 
(...) There was a discussion about this awhile ago. Since LDraw will interpret these lines as subfile commands, the lines are syntactically correct. Badly formed, but not invalid. And 754.dat is getting fixed in the 2000-01 update! Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
 
Hi, I just noticed that L3Lab interpreted the following lines as real lines, not as comments: 01 16 0 -2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat 01 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat I sent a mail to Lars to notify him of this small "bug", but then it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
 
(...) errors. (...) common (...) these (...) let (...) Having now looked in more detail at the torsos, I will probably modify this proposal. On the torsos the _shield_ is a very different shape and scale to the shield part. The actual wolf and black (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
 
(...) I get ya. It is ok to make any lego part untill or unless TLG says otherwise. (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)  
 
  Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
 
(...) Thanks for clearing that up! In that case, I'll submit the 756.dat I just posted to lugnet.cad.dat.parts to Steve Bliss. Since it is an improvement of an existing part, it shouldn't require a vote, right? Fredrik (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
 
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrd7lduwl4w.fsf....uio.no... (...) I updated the 754.dat to make it more realistic, but obviously failed to do so for 756. Feel free to improve the 756.dat! -John Van (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR